Most decisions can be made with the platform tools and the member forum. Consider paid consulting when: (1) you're under LOI on a deal larger than $750K and want a second opinion before binding diligence, (2) you're committing capital to a build over $500K and want a structural review of your plan, (3) you've operated for 12+ months but feel stuck on growth, or (4) you're considering a multi-store acquisition or chain rollup. For smaller decisions, the free tools usually answer the question.
Engagement Types
(1) Acquisition Review — fixed fee, full review of a specific deal you're under LOI on, includes deal grade, red flag scan, and structural recommendations. (2) Build Review — fixed fee, full review of a specific new-build plan including site, equipment, and financing structure. (3) Operations Audit — hourly, deep dive on an existing store including utility, labor, pricing, and equipment recommendations. (4) Strategic — hourly, multi-store growth, exit planning, or complex restructuring.
How to Engage
Submit the consult inquiry form with your specific situation. We'll respond within 1–2 business days with proposed engagement type, scope, and pricing. Engagements typically start within 1–2 weeks of acceptance. Most engagements complete in 1–4 weeks of calendar time depending on type.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who are the consultants?
Active and former laundromat operators with 5+ years of relevant experience. Each engagement is matched to a consultant whose background fits your specific need (buyer engagements go to consultants with acquisition experience, etc.).
How much does it cost?
Fixed-fee engagements typically run $750–$2,500 depending on scope. Hourly engagements typically $200–$400/hour. Pricing is quoted up front with clear scope before you commit. No surprise overages.
Do I need consulting if I have the platform tools?
Most members don't — the tools and forum cover most decisions. Consulting adds the most value at high-stakes decision points (large acquisitions, large builds, complex restructuring) where a second expert opinion materially reduces risk.